Proyectos de ley › 88.ª Asamblea General

HSB 600Murió al terminar la sesión · 20 de febrero de 2020

HSB 600

Temas:Courts & civil law

La misma legislación: SSB 3167, SF 2337, HF 2501

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado19 de febrero de 2020
  2. Hecho: Subcomité29 de enero de 2020
  3. Hecho: Comité de la Cámara20 de febrero de 2020
  4. Hecho: Lo aprueba la Cámara10 de marzo de 202054–46
  5. Se saltó: Comité del SenadoSe saltó
  6. Hecho: Lo aprueba el Senado25 de febrero de 202030–19
  7. Hecho: A gobernador(a)1 de junio de 2020
  8. Hecho: Firmado como ley1 de junio de 2020

SF 2337 se hizo ley → La misma legislación se aprobó como SF 2337, así que esta versión se dejó de lado. Ir a SF 2337 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA People suing over health problems caused by asbestos or silica would have to file a sworn form explaining the evidence for each claim. If a person cannot provide enough specific evidence against a company, the court can dismiss the case against that company. Additionally, if a person provides false information in their sworn statement, the court can award the defendant attorney fees and other costs. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to civil actions involving asbestos and silica. The bill requires a plaintiff in an asbestos action, including an action alleging a nonmalignant or a malignant condition, or a silica action involving silicosis, to file with the complaint or other initial pleading a sworn information form specifying the evidence that provides the basis for each claim against each defendant. The sworn information form must contain the information as detailed in the bill. Current law does not require a plaintiff in an asbestos action, including an action alleging a malignant condition, or a silica action involving silicosis, to file a sworn information form stating the basis for each claim against each defendant. The bill directs the court to dismiss an asbestos action or a silica action without prejudice on finding that a plaintiff has failed to make a prima facie case. The court is also required to dismiss an asbestos action or silica action without prejudice as to each defendant for whom a plaintiff lacks reliable defendant-specific evidence of sufficient exposure to asbestos or silica to create a reasonable inference that the plaintiff may be entitled to relief. The court may dismiss the action without prejudice as to all defendants if the plaintiff fails to comply with the requirements for the sworn statement. If a plaintiff’s representations supporting a claim against a defendant are materially false, the bill allows the defendant to move the court to strike the plaintiff’s pleading as to that defendant and to award the defendant attorney fees, costs, and any other relief the court determines is just and proper in the circumstances. _____ after July 1, 2020.

Cambiado después por las enmiendas H-8134, S-5015; vea Enmiendas.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés) · Qué cambió antes de aprobarse2

House subcommittee

Named January 29, 2020. On February 6, 2020 it recommended passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Modifica§686B.3

Cómo funciona el Código3

Cabildeo

13 a favor · 5 en contra · 8 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree