Bills › 88th General Assembly

HSB 122Died when the session ended · February 21, 2019

HSB 122

Topics:Transportation

Same legislation: SSB 1128, SF 302, HF 535

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 19, 2019
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 5, 2019
  3. Done: House committeeFebruary 21, 2019
  4. Done: Passes the HouseApril 16, 2019
  5. Skipped: Senate committeeSkipped
  6. Done: Passes the SenateApril 2, 201945–1
  7. Done: To the GovernorApril 30, 2019
  8. Done: Signed into lawMay 3, 2019

SF 302 became law → The same legislation passed as SF 302, so this version was set aside. Go to SF 302 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill relates to automated driving systems (ADS). OPERATION. The bill authorizes a driverless-capable vehicle to operate on the public highways without a conventional human driver physically present in the vehicle if the vehicle meets certain conditions. First, the vehicle must be capable of achieving a minimal risk condition if a malfunction of the ADS occurs that renders the ADS unable to perform any dynamic driving task within the ADS’s intended operational design domain, if any. Second, while in driverless operation, the vehicle must be capable of operating in compliance with the applicable traffic and motor vehicle safety laws and regulations of this state that govern the performance of dynamic driving tasks, unless an exemption has been granted to the vehicle by the department of transportation (DOT).

Read the full explanation

Third, the vehicle must be certified by the vehicle’s manufacturer to be in compliance with all applicable federal motor vehicle safety standards, except to the extent an exemption has been granted for the vehicle under applicable federal law or by the national highway traffic safety administration. The bill provides that the operation of a system-equipped vehicle capable of performing all dynamic driving tasks within the ADS’s operational design domain on the public highways while a conventional human driver is present in the vehicle shall be lawful. Such operation is subject to the provisions of Code chapter 321, including the requirement that the conventional human driver possess a valid driver’s license. The conventional human driver must operate the system-equipped vehicle according to the manufacturer’s requirements and specifications, and must regain manual control of the vehicle when prompted by the ADS. _____ to operate a driverless-capable vehicle that is being operated by an ADS. The ADS, while engaged, is deemed to fulfill any physical acts required of a conventional human driver to perform dynamic driving tasks. INSURANCE. The bill requires, before a system-equipped vehicle is allowed to operate on the public highways, that the owner submit to the DOT proof of financial liability coverage for the vehicle in a manner and form determined by the DOT.21, a bond filed with the DOT, a certificate of deposit filed with the DOT, or a valid certificate of self-insurance issued by the DOT. ACCIDENTS.273 where applicable and to the extent possible, and the vehicle’s owner or a person on behalf of the vehicle’s owner to promptly report the accident to law enforcement authorities.273, as applicable. NETWORKS. The bill authorizes a person to operate an on-demand driverless-capable vehicle network. An on-demand driverless-capable vehicle network may be used to facilitate the transportation of persons or goods, including transportation for hire and public transportation. _____ passengers to driverless-capable vehicles either exclusively or as part of a digital network that also connects passengers to conventional human drivers who provide transportation services in vehicles that are not driverless-capable vehicles. AUTHORITY. The bill specifies that automated driving systems and system-equipped vehicles shall be governed exclusively by the bill and regulated exclusively by the DOT. The bill prohibits a political subdivision of the state from imposing requirements, including but not limited to performance standards, specific to the operation of system-equipped vehicles, ADSs, or on-demand driverless-capable vehicle networks that are in addition to the requirements set forth under the bill. The bill also prohibits a political subdivision of the state from imposing a tax on system-equipped vehicles, ADSs, or on-demand driverless-capable vehicle networks where such tax relates specifically to the operation of system-equipped vehicles, ADSs, or on-demand driverless-capable vehicle networks. PENALTIES.482, it is a simple misdemeanor for a person to do an act forbidden or to fail to perform an act required by Code chapter 321, unless a penalty is otherwise specified by law. A simple misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than 30 days or a fine of at least $65 but not more than $625 or by both.

Changed since by amendments H-1212, H-1202, S-3096; see Amendments.

Full bill text · What changed before it passed1

House subcommittee

Named February 5, 2019. Meeting: Thursday, February 14 · 11:30 AM · House Lounge.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§321.514§321.515§321.516§321.517§321.518§321.519

How the Code works2

Lobbying

4 for · 1 against · 33 undecided · Who →

Family tree