Bills › 88th General Assembly
Relating to service of process relating to juvenile delinquency proceedings and termination of the parent-child relationship proceedings. Effective 7-1-19
Sponsored by the House Judiciary Committee
Topics:Courts & civil law
Same legislation: HSB 224
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedMarch 11, 2019
- Skipped: SubcommitteeSkipped
- Done: House committeeMarch 20, 2019
- Done: Passes the HouseMarch 20, 2019
- Done: Senate committeeApril 3, 2019
- Done: Passes the SenateApril 24, 201950–0
- Done: To the GovernorMay 2, 2019
- Done: Signed into lawMay 10, 2019
Signed into law What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
This bill provides an alternative to service of process relating to juvenile delinquency proceedings and termination of parental rights proceedings under Code chapter 232 (juvenile justice). The bill provides that in the context of providing service of a summons or notice to specified parties relating to a formal judicial proceeding to determine whether a child has committed a delinquent act, if the court determines that personal service of a summons or notice is impracticable, the court may, in addition to the current option of ordering service by certified mail addressed to the last known address of the party, provide service by electronic mail or other electronic means with the consent of the party to be served.
Read the full explanation
In the context of termination of the parent-child relationship proceeding, the bill provides that the provision of notice to necessary parties, in addition to the current options of personal service and sending notice by restricted certified mail, shall include sending notice by electronic mail or other electronic means with the consent of the party to be served, whichever is determined by the court to be the most effective means of notification.
Changed since by amendment S-3115; see Amendments.
Senate subcommittee
Named March 25, 2019. It hasn’t reported yet.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Iowa Code it changes
Lobbying
0 for · 0 against · 8 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Study bill
88th General Assembly