Bills › 88th General Assembly

HF 569Signed by Governor · May 10, 2019

Relating to personal degradation of a dependent adult as a form of dependent adult abuse by a caretaker regulated by the department of human services, and making penalties applicable. Effective 7-1-19

Sponsored by the House Judiciary Committee

Topics:Courts & civil law

Same legislation: SSB 1062, HSB 112, SF 426

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 28, 2019
  2. Skipped: SubcommitteeSkipped
  3. Done: House committeeApril 4, 2019
  4. Done: Passes the HouseApril 9, 2019
  5. Skipped: Senate committeeSkipped
  6. Done: Passes the SenateApril 24, 201950–0
  7. Done: To the GovernorApril 29, 2019
  8. Done: Signed into lawMay 10, 2019

Signed into law What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill relates to personal degradation as a form of dependent adult abuse by a caretaker regulated by the department of human services (DHS) pursuant to Code chapter 235B (dependent adult abuse). The bill defines “personal degradation” as a willful act or statement by a caretaker intended to shame, degrade, humiliate, or otherwise harm a dependent adult’s personal dignity, or a willful act or statement by a caretaker where the caretaker knew or reasonably should have known the act or statement would shame, degrade, humiliate, or otherwise harm the dependent adult’s personal dignity.

Read the full explanation

“Personal degradation” includes the taking, transmission, or display of an electronic image of a dependent adult by a caretaker, where the caretaker’s actions constitute a willful act or statement intended to shame, degrade, humiliate, or otherwise harm the personal dignity of the dependent adult. The bill creates an exception to the definition for electronic images of a dependent adult that are taken, transmitted, or displayed for the purpose of reporting dependent adult abuse or for the purpose of treatment or diagnosis or as part of an ongoing investigation. The bill provides “personal degradation” does not include the taking, transmission, or display of an electronic image by a caretaker who takes, transmits, or displays the electronic image in accordance with the confidentiality policy and release of information or consent policies of a contractor, employer, or facility or program not regulated by the department of inspections and appeals pursuant to Code chapter 235E (dependent adult abuse in facilities and programs). For purposes of Code chapter 235B, a caretaker is defined as a related or nonrelated person who has the responsibility for the protection, care, or custody of a dependent adult as a result of assuming the responsibility voluntarily, by contract, through employment, or by order of the court. A caretaker who commits the crime of dependent adult abuse by personal degradation is guilty of a serious misdemeanor. A serious misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than one year and a fine of at least $315 but not more than $1,875. A caretaker who is the subject of a report of dependent adult abuse may be placed on the dependent adult abuse registry. Under current law, a report of dependent adult abuse involving physical injury, unreasonable confinement or punishment, assault, or neglect by a caretaker which DHS determines is minor, isolated, and unlikely to reoccur is collected and maintained by DHS as an assessment only for a five-year period, is not included in the central dependent adult abuse registry, and is not considered founded dependent adult abuse. A subsequent report of dependent adult abuse involving physical injury, unreasonable confinement or punishment, assault, or neglect that occurs within that same five-year period by the same caretaker who was the subject of the previous report may be considered minor, isolated, and unlikely to reoccur depending on the circumstances. The bill expands current law to provide that a report of dependent adult abuse involving personal degradation by a caretaker which DHS determines is minor, isolated, and unlikely to reoccur shall be collected and maintained by DHS as an assessment only for a five-year period, shall not be included in the central dependent adult abuse registry, and shall not be considered founded dependent adult abuse. A subsequent report of dependent adult abuse involving personal degradation that occurs within that same five-year period by the same caretaker who was the subject of the previous report may be considered minor, isolated, and unlikely to reoccur depending on the circumstances.

Changed since by amendments S-3218, H-1089; see Amendments.

Full bill text · What changed before it passed1

Fiscal note

AI summary This bill defines personal degradation as a form of dependent adult abuse and makes it a serious misdemeanor. It is estimated to increase the Department of Human Services annual state operating costs by $123,000 in fiscal year 2020 and by $225,000 in fiscal year 2021 and subsequent years. The correctional impact of this bill cannot be determined.2

Read the fiscal note

Description

Senate File 426 adds personal degradation as a form of dependent adult abuse by a caretaker regulated by the Department of Human Services (DHS). The Bill defines personal degradation as a willful act or statement by a caretaker intended to shame, degrade, humiliate, or otherwise harm a dependent adult’s personal dignity, or a willful act or statement by a caretaker where the caretaker knew or reasonably should have known the act or statement would shame, degrade, humiliate, or otherwise harm the dependent adult’s personal dignity. This would include the taking, transmission, or display of an electronic image of a dependent adult by a caretaker. The Bill makes an exception for electronic images taken for the purpose of reporting dependent adult abuse, for the purpose of treatment or diagnosis, or as part of an ongoing investigation. The Bill also makes an exception for electronic images taken by a caretaker in accordance with the confidentiality policy and release of information or consent policies of a contractor, employer, or facility or program not regulated by the Department of Inspections and Appeals (DIA).

The Bill establishes dependent adult abuse by personal degradation as a serious misdemeanor.

Assumptions

DHS Computer System Updates:

  • Adding a new category for dependent adult abuse will require one-time updates to the Child Welfare Information System. The DHS will need to add a new allegation category to the allegation screen and adult subject screen, adding additional factors and updating assessment reports, statistical reports, and federal reports with the new abuse category.
  • The updates to the Child Welfare Information System will take 200 contract staff hours to complete at an average hourly rate of $105 per hour.
  • The match rate is 50.0% federal and 50.0% State, with all costs occurring in FY 2020. Additional DHS Staff:
  • The current annual number of intakes by the DHS is 8,476 and the number of accepted dependent adult abuse cases is 3,856. It is estimated that this Bill would increase intakes by 10.0% in FY 2020 and an additional 10.0% in FY 2021.
  • There will be 847 new intakes and 386 new accepted cases in FY 2020 and 932 additional new intakes with 419 of those accepted in FY 2021.
  • To maintain current staffing levels, the DHS would require 2.0 full-time equivalent (FTE) Social Worker 3 positions in FY 2020 and 4.0 FTE Social Worker 3 positions in FY 2021.
  • The salary for a Social Worker 3 position is $62,952. That cost is based on the minimum pay for the classification, adjusted to include benefits, FICA, and IPERS. This estimate does not reflect any changes or impact for potential salary adjustments.
  • The match rate is 10.62% federal and 89.38% State.

Correctional Impact

The correctional impact of SF 426 cannot be determined. The Bill establishes personal degradation as a serious misdemeanor and the number of convictions cannot be estimated. Table 1 below shows estimates for sentencing to State prison, parole, probation, or Community-Based Corrections (CBC) residential facilities; length of stay (LOS) under those supervisions; and supervision marginal costs per day for all serious misdemeanors. Refer to the Legislative Services Agency (LSA) memo addressed to the General Assembly, Cost Estimates Used for Correctional Impact Statements, dated January 8, 2019, for information related to the correctional system.

Table 1 — Sentencing Estimates and LOS

Minority Impact

The minority impact of SF 426 is unknown. Refer to the LSA memo addressed to the General Assembly, Minority Impact Statement, dated January 7, 2019, for information related to minorities in the criminal justice system.

Fiscal Impact

Senate File 426 is estimated to increase the DHS annual state operating costs by $123,000 in FY 2020 and $225,000 in FY 2021 and subsequent years. The increase for FY 2020 includes $10,500 in one-time upgrade costs to the Child Welfare Information System.

Sources

  • Department of Human Services
  • Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning Division, Department of Human Rights

Reading a fiscal note3

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§235B.2§235B.3

How the Code works4

Lobbying

9 for · 0 against · 11 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Similar bills

  • HSB 74 HSB 74
    88th General Assembly · Approved by committee
    Similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.