Bills › 88th General Assembly

HF 322Withdrawn · SF 379 became law instead · April 18, 2019

Relating to qualifications to practice law in Iowa and regulation of persons admitted to practice law in a jurisdiction of the United States other than Iowa

Sponsored by the House Judiciary Committee

Topics:Courts & civil law

Same legislation: HSB 9, SSB 1069, SF 379

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 8, 2019
  2. Skipped: SubcommitteeSkipped
  3. Done: House committeeApril 4, 2019
  4. Done: Passes the HouseApril 18, 2019
  5. Skipped: Senate committeeSkipped
  6. Done: Passes the SenateApril 9, 201948–0
  7. Done: To the GovernorApril 30, 2019
  8. Done: Signed into lawMay 1, 2019

SF 379 became law → The same legislation passed as SF 379, so this version was set aside. Go to SF 379 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill removes the requirement that an applicant for admission to practice law (be admitted to the bar) in Iowa be a resident of Iowa. The bill, in part, is a response to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. 274 (1985). That case held that a state residency requirement to be admitted to the bar violated the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution. The bill provides that people who are qualified to be admitted to practice law in Iowa at the discretion of the court include not only persons who have been admitted to the bars of any other state or the District of Columbia but also a territory of the United States.

Read the full explanation

Finally, the bill provides that an out-of-state attorney admitted to the bar of the District of Columbia or a territory of the United States may apply to appear pro hac vice in an Iowa case and removes the requirement that the local attorney be a resident of Iowa; however, it maintains the requirement that the local attorney be admitted to practice law in the state of Iowa.

Full bill text · What changed before it passed1

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§602.1010§602.1011

How the Code works2

Lobbying

1 for · 0 against · 7 undecided · Who →

Family tree