Proyectos de ley › 88.ª Asamblea General
Relating to court-ordered reimbursement of jail costs and restitution
Presentado por el comité Judiciary de la Cámara
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado27 de febrero de 2020
- Se detuvo: SubcomitéMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: Comité del Senado
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2020 terminó el 14 de junio de 2020, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
La explicación oficial está en inglés; todavía no hay resumen en palabras sencillas.
This bill relates to court-ordered reimbursement of jail costs and restitution. Under current law, a sheriff or municipality may choose to enforce a claim of reimbursement for charges for administrative costs and room and board costs at a jail or municipal holding facility as a civil claim. Once the claim is approved by the court, it shall have the force and effect of a judgment for purposes of enforcement by the sheriff or municipality. Under the bill, if the claim of reimbursement was not requested to be included within the order for payment of restitution, the court-approved claim shall be a civil judgment against the prisoner in favor of the sheriff or county, or the municipality, and is not subject to a court’s determination of the prisoner’s reasonable ability to pay.
Lea la explicación completa
Current law provides the court must make a determination of an offender’s reasonable ability to pay in a criminal case prior to entering a restitution order against the offender for crime victim assistance reimbursement, restitution to public agencies, court costs including correctional fees, court-appointed attorney fees, contributions to a local anticrime organization, and restitution to the medical assistance program.9. Under current law, when a court makes a determination an offender is not reasonably able to pay, the court may require the offender to perform public service in lieu of payment for crime victim compensation program costs, public agency restitution, court costs, court-appointed attorney fees, contributions to a local anticrime organization, or medical assistance program restitution.9. Under current law, if the full amount of restitution cannot be determined at the time of sentencing, the court is required to issue a temporary order determining a reasonable amount for restitution identified at that time, and shall issue a permanent, supplemental order determining the full amount of restitution at a later date. The bill strikes this provision.9, including the expense of a public defender, at the time of sentencing or a later date to be determined by the court. Under current law, the offender or the office or individual who prepared the offender’s restitution plan may petition the court for a hearing on any matter related to the plan of restitution at any time during the offender’s period of probation, parole, or incarceration. The bill requires a petition for a hearing relating to the amount of restitution to be filed by the offender or the office or individual who prepared the offender’s restitution plan within days of the date of the restitution order. A petition relating to the offender’s reasonable ability to pay court-appointed attorney fees, including the expense of a public defender, shall be filed within days of the date of the sentencing order or within days of the date of any supplemental restitution order. Under the bill, if an offender does not file a petition within the time periods specified in the bill, the failure to file shall be deemed a waiver of any objection to the offender’s plan of restitution and an acknowledgment that the offender has the reasonable ability to pay court-appointed attorney fees as previously determined by the court.
Nota fiscal
Can’t be estimated Compare con otros proyectos
House File 2583 may increase the assessments and collections by the State of the restitution no longer subject to the ability-to-pay determination. The extent of this increase cannot be determined. 0 million in court costs owed to the State as court debt. The following table provides the total court costs owed as court debt to the State since FY 2015. 7, but the extent of the impact cannot be determined.
- Restitution, Court-Appointed Attorney Fees · 4 de marzo de 2020
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Cabildeo
3 a favor · 4 en contra · 14 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
88th General Assembly