Proyectos de ley › 88.ª Asamblea General
Related to pharmacy benefits managers and prescription drug prices, and including applicability provisions
Presentado por el comité Human Resources de la Cámara
Temas:Business & economyHealth carePrescription drug prices
La misma legislación: HSB 685
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado25 de febrero de 2020
- Se saltó: SubcomitéSe saltó
- Hecho: Comité de la Cámara10 de marzo de 2020
- Hecho: Lo aprueba la Cámara10 de marzo de 2020
- Se detuvo: Comité del SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2020 terminó el 14 de junio de 2020, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
La explicación oficial está en inglés; todavía no hay resumen en palabras sencillas.
This bill relates to pharmacy benefits managers and prescription drug prices. “Pharmacy benefits manager” (PBM) is defined in the bill as a person who, pursuant to a contract or other relationship with a health carrier, either directly or through an intermediary, provides pharmacy benefits management services for the health carrier. “Pharmacy benefits management services” is defined as, on behalf of a health carrier, the procurement of prescription drugs at a negotiated rate for dispensing within this state, the processing of prescription drug claims, or the administration of payments related to prescription drug claims.
Lea la explicación completa
The bill details the requirements that must be satisfied before a PBM places a particular drug on a maximum allowable cost list, or continues a particular drug on a maximum allowable cost list. “Maximum allowable cost list” (MAC list) is defined in the bill as a list of drugs or other methodology used by a PBM, directly or indirectly, setting the maximum allowable payment to a pharmacy for a generic drug, brand-name drug, biological product, or other prescription drug. A PBM cannot place a drug on the MAC list unless the PBM first complies with the requirements in the bill, including ensuring that the drug is available for purchase by each pharmacy in this state for a national or regional wholesaler licensed in this state. A PBM must allow a pharmacy that is subject to a MAC list to have access to the list. The PBM is required to update a MAC list within seven calendar days of the date of an increase in the pharmacy acquisition cost, a change in methodology on which the MAC is based, or a change in any value of any variable involved in the methodology on which the MAC list is based. The PBM must provide a pharmacy subject to a MAC list with prompt notification of any updates to the MAC list. The bill provides that a PBM cannot reimburse a pharmacy in this state for a prescription drug in an amount less than the amount that the PBM reimburses a PBM affiliate for providing the same prescription drug. A pharmacy may decline to provide pharmacist services to a PBM or to a covered person if, as a result of a maximum allowable cost list, a pharmacy is to be paid less than that pharmacy’s pharmacy acquisition cost for the prescription drug. The bill requires a PBM to provide an appeal procedure to allow a pharmacy to challenge a maximum allowable cost list, and any reimbursement made under a maximum allowable cost list. The appeal procedure must include a dedicated telephone number, email address, and internet site for a pharmacy to submit appeals, and must include the ability to submit an appeal directly to the PBM or directly to the pharmacy service administration organization. Additional requirements for the appeals process, including the PBM’s obligations if an appeal is upheld or denied, are detailed in the bill. The bill prohibits a PBM or a health carrier from, as a condition of payment, reimbursement, or network participation, requiring a pharmacy to meet accreditation, certification, or credentialing standards that are inconsistent with, more stringent than, or in addition to the federal and state requirements applicable to a pharmacy in this state; or to satisfy any insurance, surety bond, or other financial guarantee requirements that are inconsistent with, more stringent than, or in addition to the federal and state requirements applicable to a pharmacy in this state. The bill also prohibits the PBM from charging or holding a pharmacy responsible for certain fees as detailed in the bill. A PBM or a health carrier also cannot directly or indirectly charge or hold a pharmacy responsible for a fee related to a claim in any of the circumstances detailed in the bill. A PBM is additionally prohibited from conducting spread pricing in this state. “Spread pricing” is defined as a model of prescription drug pricing in which a PBM charges a health benefit plan a contracted price for a prescription drug, and the contracted price for the prescription drug differs from the amount the PBM directly or indirectly pays a pharmacy for the prescription drug. The bill prohibits a PBM from terminating a contracted pharmacy for providing direct delivery or delivery by mail for prescriptions to covered persons. After the date of receipt of a clean claim for payment from a contracted pharmacy, the bill prohibits a PBM from retroactively reducing payment on the claim, either directly or indirectly, through an aggregated effective rate, direct or indirect remuneration, a quality assurance program, or any other means unless the claim is found not to be a clean claim during the course of a routine audit performed by the PBM. The bill provides that if a contracted pharmacy adjudicates a claim at the point of sale, the reimbursement amount provided to the pharmacy by the PBM is the final reimbursement amount. A PBM cannot recoup funds from a contracted pharmacy in connection with claims for which the pharmacy has already been paid except in circumstances outlined in the bill. The bill authorizes the commissioner of insurance to review and approve the compensation program of a PBM for a health carrier to ensure that the reimbursement for services provided by a contracted pharmacy is fair, reasonable, and appropriate to provide an adequate PBM network for the health carrier. The bill requires the commissioner to adopt rules to administer the provisions of the bill and to take any enforcement action under the commissioner’s authority to enforce compliance with the provisions of the bill. The bill provides that if any provision of the bill is held invalid, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the bill which can be given effect without the invalid provisions.3, relating to current enforcement and rulemaking authority, and makes conforming changes throughout Code chapter 510B. The bill applies to a PBM providing pharmacy benefits management services in this state on or after the effective date of the bill.
Senate subcommittee
Named March 12, 2020. It hasn’t reported yet.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Nota fiscal
Cost: up to $350,000 Compare con otros proyectos
Resumen con IA This bill sets new requirements for pharmacy benefit managers regarding drug pricing lists and reimbursement practices. It is estimated that the State of Iowa's pharmaceutical costs for employee health insurance could increase by approximately $800,000 to $1.6 million per year. Additionally, the Iowa Insurance Division would incur approximately $350,000 per year in costs from the Commerce Revolving Fund to hire three new staff members for enforcement. (en inglés)2
Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)
Description
House File 2553 places requirements on a Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) regarding the policies and procedures of maximum allowable cost lists (MAC lists), and provides certain rights and permissions to contracted pharmacies when they operate with a PBM. The Bill creates specific requirements that must be met before a PBM can place or continue to include a particular drug on the MAC list, including that the listed drug on the MAC list must be available for purchase by each pharmacy in this State from a national or regional wholesaler licensed in this State. The PBM must allow a pharmacy access to the MAC list, and must update the MAC list within seven calendar days of the date of an increase in acquisition costs, a change in MAC methodology, or a change in the value of any variable used in the methodology on which the MAC is based.
The Bill also provides that a PBM cannot reimburse a pharmacy for an amount less than the amount that the PBM reimburses an affiliate for the same drug. A PBM is also prohibited from reducing the payment amount on a claim after the date of receiving a clean claim for payment from a contracted pharmacy. The Bill prohibits a PBM from terminating a contracted pharmacy for providing direct delivery or delivery by mail of drugs to covered persons. Under the provisions of this Bill, PBMs are also prohibited from a practice called “spread pricing” wherein a PBM charges a health benefit plan a contracted price for a drug and the price differs from the amount the PBM directly or indirectly pays a pharmacy for that same drug. The Bill permits a pharmacy to decline to provide services to a PBM or a covered person if the cost allowed on the MAC list results in the pharmacy being paid less than the pharmacy’s acquisition cost for the drug.
The obligation and authority of enforcing the provisions contained in this Bill is given to the Commissioner of Insurance with procedures set forth in Iowa Code chapters 507 and 510.
Background
A PBM is a health care entity that contracts with insurers, employers, unions, and government programs to administer the prescription drug portion of the health care benefit. A MAC list is a list of drugs or methodologies used by a PBM setting the maximum allowable payment to a pharmacy for a prescription drug.
In 2019, SF 563 was enacted which created Iowa Code chapter 510C, which requires pharmacy benefit managers to annually report to the Commissioner of Insurance information about rebates and fees received, with the Commissioner posting nonconfidential information received to a publicly accessible website.
Assumptions
Iowa Employee Group Health Insurance Plan
Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Iowa (Wellmark) asserts that according to published industry studies, the use of PBMs result in savings of 10.0% to 20.0% in pharmaceutical costs to health benefits plans. Wellmark further estimates that the provisions of this Bill would reduce the effectiveness of PBMs by 1.0% to 2.0%.
Enforcement
The Iowa Insurance Division (IID) estimates that it would need to hire a compliance officer and two insurance company examiner specialists to perform its increased obligations as detailed in the Bill. The IID assumes that the appropriation for additional staff would come from the Commerce Revolving Fund.
Fiscal Impact
Iowa Employee Group Health Insurance Plan
The current pharmaceutical cost of the State of Iowa plans is approximately $80.0 million. Based on the 1.0% to 2.0% estimated reduction in savings assumed by Wellmark, this legislation could result in an increase in the State’s pharmaceutical costs of approximately $800,000 to $1.6 million per year.
Enforcement
The estimated annual costs IID would incur are $110,000 for the compliance officer and $240,000 for the two insurance company examiner specialists. The total costs incurred by the IID for the three new FTEs would be approximately $350,000 per year from the Commerce Revolving Fund.
Sources
- Department of Administrative Services
- Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Iowa
- National Drug Acquisition Cost · 10 de marzo de 2020 · $350,000
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Crea§510B.11§510B.12§510B.13§510B.14§510B.15§510B.8A§510B.8B
Modifica§510B.1§510B.10§510B.2§510B.4§510B.5§510B.6§510B.7§510B.8§510B.9
Deroga§510B.3
Cabildeo
1 a favor · 3 en contra · 24 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Study bill
88th General Assembly