Proyectos de ley › 88.ª Asamblea General
Relating to the crime of disorderly conduct and making penalties applicable
Presentado por el comité Judiciary de la Cámara
Temas:Courts & civil law
La misma legislación: HSB 661
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado19 de febrero de 2020
- Se saltó: SubcomitéSe saltó
- Hecho: Comité de la Cámara3 de marzo de 2020
- Hecho: Lo aprueba la Cámara3 de marzo de 2020
- Hecho: Comité del Senado9 de junio de 2020
- Se detuvo: Lo aprueba el SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2020 terminó el 14 de junio de 2020, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
La explicación oficial está en inglés; todavía no hay resumen en palabras sencillas.
Under current law, a person engages in disorderly conduct when the person makes loud and raucous noise in the vicinity of any residence or public building which causes unreasonable distress to the occupants thereof. This bill requires a person to intentionally or recklessly cause unreasonable distress when the person engages in loud and raucous noise in the vicinity of any residence or public building. A person who violates this provision commits a simple misdemeanor, punishable by confinement for no more than days or a fine of at least $65 but more than $625 or both.
Senate subcommittee
Named March 4, 2020. On March 11, 2020 it recommended passage.
- Sen. Julian B. Garrett R
- Sen. Zach Nunn R
- Sen. R. Taylor
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Nota fiscal
Can’t be estimated Compare con otros proyectos
Resumen con IA This bill changes the definition of disorderly conduct to require that a person acts intentionally or recklessly when making loud and raucous noise near a residence or public building. The fiscal impact of this bill is unknown because the effect on the correctional system cannot be estimated with current data. The impact on fine and surcharge revenue also cannot be determined. (en inglés)2
Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)
Description
House File 2444 adds to the definition of disorderly conduct the requirement that a person intentionally or recklessly cause unreasonable distress when the person engages in loud and raucous noise in the vicinity of any residence or public building in order to be guilty of disorderly conduct. A person who violates this Bill commits a simple misdemeanor.
Background
Under current law, a person engages in disorderly conduct when the person makes loud and raucous noise in the vicinity of any residence or public building which causes unreasonable distress to the occupants thereof.
A simple misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than 30 days or a fine of at least $65 but no more than $625.
Assumptions
- The following will not change over the projection period: charge, conviction, and sentencing patterns and trends; prisoner length of stay; revocation rates; plea bargaining; and other criminal justice system policies and practices.
- A lag effect of six months is assumed from the effective date of this Bill to the date of first entry of affected offenders into the correctional system.
- Marginal costs for county jails cannot be estimated due to a lack of data. For purposes of this analysis, the marginal cost for county jails is assumed to be $50 per day.
Correctional Impact
House File 2444 adds the requirement of reckless or intentional behavior to the definition of offense of disorderly conduct. Since HF 2444 would restrict the definition of disorderly conduct in a way that cannot be accounted for with current data, the correctional impact cannot be estimated. In FY 2019, there were approximately 1,415 disorderly conduct convictions. Refer to the Legislative Services Agency (LSA) memo addressed to the General Assembly, Cost Estimates Used for Correctional Impact Statements, dated January 16, 2020, for information related to the correctional system.
Minority Impact
House File 2444 would restrict the definition of disorderly conduct in a way that cannot be accounted for with current data, and the minority impact of this legislation cannot be estimated. In FY 2019, African Americans made up 3.6% of the adult population of the State of Iowa and approximately 21.4% of disorderly conduct convictions. According to the Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning Division, this exceeds the population proportion of the State, which would lead to a racial impact if the proportion remains constant. Due to the low numbers in other minority categories, the impact on those populations cannot be assessed. Refer to the LSA memo addressed to the General Assembly, Minority Impact Statement, dated January 15, 2020, for information related to minorities in the criminal justice system.
Fiscal Impact
The fiscal impact of HF 2444 is unknown due to the unknown correctional impact of the Bill. The average State cost for one simple misdemeanor conviction ranges from $40 to $350. The minimum cost includes court time for a magistrate or district associate judge, court reporter, judicial specialist, and clerk of court staff. The maximum cost includes court time and the costs of indigent defense. The new definition of disorderly conduct under House File 2444 may also affect fine and surcharge revenue, but the impact is unknown.
Source
- Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning Division, Department of Human Rights
- Disorderly Conduct · 24 de febrero de 2020
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Modifica§723.4
Cabildeo
3 a favor · 0 en contra · 4 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Study bill
88th General Assembly
Picked up later
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Similar bills
- HF 232 Relating to the crime of disorderly conduct and making penalties applicable89th General Assembly · Signed by GovernorNearly identical
Matched by wording or an identical title.