Bills › 88th General Assembly
Relating to filing requirements applicable to extensions of real estate conveyances or transactions under specified circumstances
Sponsored by the House Commerce Committee
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedJanuary 31, 2020
- Skipped: SubcommitteeSkipped
- Done: House committeeMarch 3, 2020
- Done: Passes the HouseMarch 3, 2020
- Skipped: Senate committeeSkipped
- Done: Passes the SenateFebruary 25, 202050–0
- Done: To the GovernorMarch 11, 2020
- Done: Signed into lawMarch 12, 2020
SF 2137 became law → The same legislation passed as SF 2137, so this version was set aside. Go to SF 2137 What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
21 has yet to expire, the owner or assignee of the instrument may show a modification of the maturity date, an extension of the maturity date, or an extension of any associated indebtedness by filing a duly acknowledged extension agreement in the office of the recorder where the instrument was recorded. This bill removes the requirement that an extension agreement be duly acknowledged as the original instrument was required to be acknowledged when a filing of the agreement in the county recorder’s office takes place.
Read the full explanation
Instead, the bill provides that the filing of an extension agreement or other documentation confirming an agreement to extend the maturity date of the instrument, debt, or indebtedness secured thereby is sufficient. In addition, the bill provides that a grantor or mortgagor, by authorizing or becoming bound under an existing mortgage, bond for deed, trust deed, or contract for the sale or conveyance of real estate, authorizes the holder of the debt or owner or assignee of the instrument to make the filings specified in the bill.
Family tree
88th General Assembly