Bills › 88th General Assembly
Relating to judicial motions and causes of action arising from a person’s participation in matters of public significance
Sponsored by the House Judiciary Committee
Topics:Civil rightsCourts & civil law
Same legislation: HSB 537
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 11, 2020
- Skipped: SubcommitteeSkipped
- Done: House committeeFebruary 25, 2020
- Done: Passes the HouseFebruary 25, 2020
- Done: Senate committeeJune 9, 2020
- Stopped: Passes the SenateDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2020 session adjourned on June 14, 2020, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary People who speak out or petition the government about public issues can use a special legal motion to quickly dismiss certain lawsuits against them. If a person wins this motion, they can have their attorney fees and costs paid by the other side, unless the lawsuit was about open meetings or public records. This rule does not apply to legal actions taken by government prosecutors.1
Read the official explanation
This bill relates to causes of action arising from a person’s participation in matters of public significance. The bill defines an “act in furtherance of the person’s right of petition or free speech under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Iowa in connection with a public issue” to include all of the following: any written or oral statement or writing made before a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding, or any other official proceeding authorized by law; any written or oral statement or writing made in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial body, or any other official proceeding authorized by law; any written or oral statement or writing made in a place open to the public or a public forum in connection with an issue of public interest; and any other conduct in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of petition or the constitutional right of free speech in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest. The bill provides that causes of action against a person arising from any act or omission of that person in furtherance of the person’s right of petition or free speech in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike. However, such causes of action shall not be subject to a special motion to strike if the court determines the plaintiff has established there is a probability the plaintiff will prevail on the claim. In making this determination, the the court is to consider the pleadings and supporting and opposing affidavits. The bill provides that if the court determines the plaintiff has established a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim, neither that determination nor the fact of that determination shall be admissible in evidence at any later stage of the case, or in any subsequent action. Further, such findings are not to affect the burden of proof or degree of proof otherwise applicable in any later stage of the case or in any subsequent proceeding. The bill provides that a defendant who prevails on a special motion to strike is entitled to recover costs and reasonable attorney fees, unless the cause of action was brought pursuant to Code chapter (open meetings), (open records), or (public information board). If the court finds that a special motion to strike is frivolous or is solely intended to cause unnecessary delay, the court must award costs and reasonable attorney fees to the plaintiff prevailing on the motion for costs incurred to oppose the motion. The bill also describes when the special motion is to be filed and when the hearing is to be held. Specifically, the special motion may be filed within days after the service of the complaint or, in the court’s discretion, at any later time. The motion is to be scheduled by the clerk of the court for a hearing not more than days after the service of the motion unless the docket conditions of the court require a later hearing. All discovery proceedings in the action are to be stayed upon the filing of a notice of motion. The stay of discovery is to remain in effect until notice of entry of the order ruling on the motion. However, the court may order that specified discovery be conducted. An order granting or denying a special motion to strike is appealable under the rules of appellate procedure. Information related to these special motions to strike is to be maintained by the judicial branch. Any party who files a special motion to strike and any party who files an opposition to a special motion to strike is required to transmit to the judicial branch information related to the special motion or opposition. The judicial branch is to maintain a public record of such information for at least three years. Finally, the provisions of the bill do not apply to any enforcement action brought by the attorney general, a district attorney, a county attorney, a city attorney, or any attorney charged with prosecuting violations of state or local laws.
Changed since by amendment H-8023; see Amendments.
Senate subcommittee
Named June 3, 2020. It hasn’t reported yet.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Family tree
Study bill
88th General Assembly
Picked up later
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Similar bills
- HSB 12 HSB 1289th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passageNearly identical
Matched by wording or an identical title.