Bills › 88th General Assembly

HF 2336Died when the session ended · February 17, 2020

Relating to the crime of invasion of privacy

Topics:Crime & corrections

Same legislation: SF 2157, SF 2286

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 5, 2020
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 12, 2020
  3. Done: House committeeFebruary 18, 2020
  4. Stopped: Passes the HouseDied when the General Assembly ended
  5. Next: Senate committee
  6. Next: Passes the Senate
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The 2020 session adjourned on June 14, 2020, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary People who secretly film or photograph others while they are naked would face new legal consequences. Under this change, the person does not have to be acting for sexual gratification to be found guilty of invasion of privacy. Those convicted would be required to register as sex offenders and could face jail time and fines.1

Read the official explanation

Under current law, to be guilty of invasion of privacy, a person must knowingly view, photograph, or film another person for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of any person, if the other person does not consent or is unable to consent to being viewed, photographed, or filmed; the other person is in a state of full or partial nudity; and the other person has a reasonable expectation of privacy while in a state of full or partial nudity. This bill eliminates the requirement that the person act for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of any person. A person found guilty of invasion of privacy is, upon conviction, guilty of an aggravated misdemeanor. An aggravated misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than two years and a fine of at least $625 but not more than $6,250. A person convicted under the bill is classified as a tier II sex offender for the purposes of the sex offender registry.

Full bill text2

House subcommittee

Named February 12, 2020. On February 17, 2020 it recommended indefinite postponement.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Fiscal note

AI summary This bill changes the law so that a person can be convicted of invasion of privacy even if they do not act with the intent to cause sexual arousal or gratification. Because it is unknown how many more people will be convicted or sent to prison, the fiscal impact on the state cannot be estimated.3

Read the fiscal note

Description

Senate File 2286 eliminates the requirement that when a person knowingly views, photographs, or films another person, it must be for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of any person in order to be convicted of invasion of privacy.

Background

Under current law, to be guilty of invasion of privacy, a person must knowingly view, photograph, or film another person for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of any person, if the other person does not consent or is unable to consent to being viewed, photographed, or filmed; the other person is in a state of full or partial nudity; and the other person has a reasonable expectation of privacy while in a state of full or partial nudity. Invasion of privacy is an aggravated misdemeanor punishable by confinement for no more than two years and a fine of at least $625 but not more than $6,250. A person convicted under this Bill is also classified as a tier II sex offender for the purposes of the sex offender registry.

Assumptions

  • The following will not change over the projection period: charge, conviction, and sentencing patterns and trends; prisoner length of stay; revocation rates; plea bargaining; and other criminal justice system policies and practices.
  • A lag effect of six months is assumed from the effective date of this Bill to the date of first entry of affected offenders into the correctional system.
  • Marginal costs for county jails cannot be estimated due to a lack of data. For purposes of this analysis, the marginal cost for county jails is assumed to be $50 per day.

Correctional Impact

Senate File 2286 is estimated to increase the number of convictions for this offense and subsequently prison and community corrections admissions. In FY 2019, there were 163 invasion of privacy convictions under Iowa Code section 709.21(1). During the same year, there were 112 dismissals and acquittals of invasion of privacy charges. Under this Bill, it is possible that some of the dismissals may become convictions, but due to a lack of data on the reason for dismissal, a correctional impact cannot be estimated.

Refer to the Legislative Services Agency (LSA) memo addressed to the General Assembly, Cost Estimates Used for Correctional Impact Statements, dated January 16, 2020, for information related to the correctional system.

Minority Impact

Senate File 2286 expands the definition of a current crime, and a minority impact cannot be estimated due to a lack of data. In FY 2019, the invasion of privacy conviction demographics were as follows: 57.1% White; 6.6% AfricanAmerican; 5.1% Hispanic; and 3.0% Asian. Refer to the LSA memo addressed to the General Assembly, Minority Impact Statement, dated January 15, 2020, for information related to minorities in the criminal justice system.

Fiscal Impact

The fiscal impact of SF 2286 cannot be estimated due to the unknown correctional impact. The average State cost for an aggravated misdemeanor ranges from $5,600 to $8,000. This estimate includes operating costs incurred by the Judicial Branch, the State Public Defender, and the Department of Corrections (DOC) for one conviction. The cost would be incurred across multiple years for prison and parole supervision and includes the cost of sex offender intensive supervision.

Sources

  • Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning, Department of Human Rights
  • Department of Corrections

Reading a fiscal note4

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§709.21

How the Code works5

Lobbying

1 for · 1 against · 9 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Similar bills

  • SF 289 Relating to invasion of privacy, and making penalties applicable
    91st General Assembly · Passed Senate
    Similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.