Bills › 88th General Assembly

HF 2306Died when the session ended · February 17, 2020

Relating to public safety nuisances concerning licensed premises where alcoholic beverages, wine, or beer is sold or consumed

Topics:Alcohol, cannabis & gamingCourts & civil lawPublic safety & emergencies

Same legislation: SSB 3127

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 10, 2020
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 10, 2020
  3. Stopped: House committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
  4. Next: Passes the House
  5. Next: Senate committee
  6. Next: Passes the Senate
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The 2020 session adjourned on June 14, 2020, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary Local officials can take legal action against businesses with liquor licenses if dangerous activities like shootings or riots happen on their property or nearby three times in one year. If a court agrees that these events created a public safety problem, a judge can order the business to fix the issue. This new process is the only way to handle these specific types of public safety nuisance cases.1

Read the official explanation

This bill establishes the requirements for establishing and abating a public safety nuisance under Code chapter 123.56 provides that a public safety nuisance exists when it is established by clear and convincing evidence that an owner, manager, employee, contemporaneous patron, or guest of a premises licensed under Code chapter 123 unlawfully discharges a firearm or uses an offensive weapon, assaults another person with a dangerous weapon, or engages in a riot on at least three separate days within any 12-month period, on the premises or within 1,500 feet of the premises. The bill provides that if the county attorney or city attorney where the licensed premises is located believes a public safety nuisance exists, the county attorney or city attorney, or attorney acting at the direction of the county attorney or city attorney, may file a suit in equity in district court without bond seeking abatement of the public safety nuisance. The bill provides that a public safety nuisance action shall be given priority over other business pending before the district court and the trial shall begin within days after the filing of the action. The bill then describes evidence that may be considered in an action seeking abatement of the public safety nuisance. Finally, the bill provides that if the district court finds that a public safety nuisance exists, the court may enter judgment declaring the existence of the nuisance and order such remedial action as the court determines reasonable to abate the nuisance. The bill describes appropriate remedial action that may be taken by the district court. The bill also provides that the new Code section shall be the exclusive method for establishing and abating a public safety nuisance as described in the new Code section.

Full bill text2

House subcommittee

Named February 10, 2020. On February 17, 2020 it recommended amendment and passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§123.56

How the Code works3

Lobbying

3 for · 1 against · 18 undecided · Who →

Family tree

88th General Assembly

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Similar bills

  • HSB 633 HSB 633
    89th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 2340
    Very similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.