Bills › 88th General Assembly
Requiring consideration of anti-Semitism by governmental entities when investigating possible discriminatory acts
Topics:Civil rightsState government
Same legislation: HF 2504
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 10, 2020
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 11, 2020
- Done: House committeeFebruary 20, 2020
- Done: Passes the HouseMarch 5, 202051–45
- Stopped: Senate committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2020 session adjourned on June 14, 2020, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Government agencies that investigate discrimination must use a specific definition of anti-Semitism when deciding if an act was motivated by hate. This definition comes from an international group and includes certain examples of how people might target Jewish individuals or their property. However, the rule does not count criticism of the country of Israel as anti-Semitism.1
Read the official explanation
This bill requires a governmental entity reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of any law, rule, or policy prohibiting discriminatory acts to take into consideration the definition of anti-Semitism set forth in the bill for purposes of determining whether an alleged act was motivated by discriminatory anti-Semitic intent. The bill defines “anti-Semitism” as the definition of anti-Semitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the international holocaust remembrance alliance (“IHRA”), including the contemporary examples of anti-Semitism accompanying such definition. “Anti-Semitism” does not include criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country. The IHRA definition provides: “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities”. The IHRA definition includes contemporary examples of anti-Semitism, including calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion. The bill shall not be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the Constitution of the State of Iowa or the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States and shall not be construed to conflict with local, state, or federal discrimination laws.
House subcommittee
Named February 11, 2020. On February 13, 2020 it recommended amendment and passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Iowa Code it changes
Lobbying
10 for · 1 against · 3 undecided · Who →
Family tree
88th General Assembly