Proyectos de ley › 91.ª Asamblea General
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Iowa relating to citizen initiatives to amend the Constitution of the State of Iowa
Presentado por Sen. Matt Blake (D), Sen. Molly Donahue (D), Sen. William A. Dotzler Jr. (D), Sen. Sarah Trone Garriott (D), Sen. Janet Petersen (D), Sen. Herman C. Quirmbach (D), Sen. Zach Wahls (D), Sen. Cindy Winckler (D), Sen. Mike Zimmer (D)
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado25 de febrero de 2025
- Se detuvo: Aprobado en comitéNo se aprobó
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: Se aprueba otra vez en la próxima Asamblea GeneralCon las mismas palabras, después de una elección
- Sigue: Deciden los votantesEn la boleta de la próxima elección general
No se aprobó No pasó por ambas cámaras antes de que terminara la Asamblea General. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA This resolution would change how Iowans can propose new changes to the state constitution through citizen petitions. It sets specific rules for how many signatures are needed and allows both supporters and opponents to provide written arguments for voters to read. If a proposed change breaks certain rules, voters would have to approve both the petition itself and the actual change being proposed. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
8 This joint resolution proposes an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Iowa relating to citizen initiatives to amend the Constitution of the State of Iowa. The amendment allows a petitioner who collects a number of signatures from qualified electors equal to 10 percent of the total number of ballots cast for governor in the last gubernatorial election, including signatures from a number of qualified electors from at least one-half of all counties in this state equal to 5 percent of the total number of ballots cast for governor in the last gubernatorial election in that county, to submit the proposed constitutional amendment to the secretary of state for submission to the electorate at a general election. The amendment allows a petitioner to include with a proposed constitutional amendment an argument of no more than 300 words in support of a proposed constitutional amendment. The amendment requires the general assembly, or the governor if the general assembly is not in session, to appoint a person to submit an argument of no more than 300 words in opposition to the constitutional amendment. The amendment requires the proposed constitutional amendment, along with the arguments for and against the proposed constitutional amendment, to be published in the same manner as a constitutional amendment proposed by the general assembly. For proposed constitutional amendments that violate certain principles enumerated in the resolution’s amendment, the resolution’s amendment requires electors to both approve the right of the petitioner to propose the constitutional amendment and to approve the proposed constitutional amendment. The proposed constitutional amendment only takes effect upon the approval of both questions by a majority of qualified electors casting votes thereon. 8 and exclusive jurisdiction over challenges to petitions and signatures for constitutional amendments proposed by initiative. The amendment creates a timeline for the challenge of petitions and signatures, the resolution of such challenges, and the curing of insufficient petitions. The resolution, if adopted, would be published and then referred to the next general assembly (92nd) for adoption, before being submitted to the electorate for ratification.
Senate subcommittee
Named February 26, 2025. It hasn’t reported yet.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Cabildeo
3 a favor · 1 en contra · 1 indecisos · Quiénes →