Proyectos de ley › 91.ª Asamblea General
Relating to the Iowa rules of criminal procedure including commitment hearings following an acquittal based on insanity
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado15 de enero de 2026
- Hecho: Subcomité28 de enero de 2026
- Hecho: Comité de la Cámara12 de febrero de 2026
- Se saltó: Lo aprueba la CámaraSigue como HF 2571
- Sigue: Comité del Senado
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Ahora es HF 2571 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a HF 2571 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA When a person is found not guilty because of insanity, a court must decide if they should stay in a mental health facility. This law gives judges a specific list of things to look at, such as a person's past behavior and mental health history, to decide if they are still dangerous. It also says a judge cannot decide someone is safe just because they haven't acted out recently. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to the Iowa rules of criminal procedure including commitment hearings following an acquittal based on insanity. The bill provides a list of factors a court must consider in determining whether a defendant continues to be mentally ill and dangerous to the defendant’s self or others. The bill states that the absence of recent overt acts of dangerousness shall not, by itself, be the sole determining factor in assessing whether the defendant poses a risk to the defendant’s self or others. _____ and independent functioning, environmental influences, and expert testimony and risk assessment reports. The revised rules of criminal procedure shall be submitted for legislative council review no later than October 14, 2026.
Cambiado después por las enmiendas S-5138, H-8252; vea Enmiendas.
Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés) · Qué cambió antes de aprobarse2
House subcommittee
Named January 28, 2026. On February 5, 2026 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Cabildeo
4 a favor · 0 en contra · 13 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Study bill
91st General Assembly